This text has been automatically translated by Google. Switch to original
Technically very functional, well-maintained, and neat camper. Drives like a newer, much smaller van and is easy to maneuver in traffic and at the campsite/on narrower roads. It is released remarkably complete, with all inventory included that you will ever need (and even more that you didn't realize was already there), so you don't have to bring anything yourself. It has a usable, complete, and practical layout that facilitates a long and comfortable stay for 2 people very well. Good value for money and a great camper to spend a comfortable holiday in. However, the landlord does require an additional cash deposit for "contingencies" (outside the regular GoBoony deposit) which is not stated in the terms and conditions, but which we did agree to just before the start of the holiday. We have registered this in the digital registration upon receipt (GoForm). In the aftermath/handling following the return, a "conflict" arose regarding the level of cleanliness of the camper, during which our impression was that the rental company adopted a rather nitpicky and judgmental/condemning attitude. Instead of communicating about this in advance and transparently, an additional bill was proposed as "compensation" for the so-called preparation for rental, with which we disagreed. In further communication regarding this matter, the landlord "used" contact with GoBoony as a shield to still claim cleaning costs using the GoBoony deposit, which is only refunded later. After going through a formal dispute procedure, the full amount was refunded. The aforementioned cash deposit had already been returned earlier (after the first inspection without damage to the camper). All in all, a more than usable, fun, and practical camper with all the equipment you wouldn't otherwise have (in good/neat condition) present. Great camper for traveling for an extended period (even if the weather is less than ideal). Regarding our dispute with the landlord, it was likely an unfortunate combination of circumstances in which the additional deposit (which had already been returned before the dispute arose) could possibly have led to a discussion. More specific agreements beforehand (mentioning them better during pickup) could probably have prevented the resulting annoyance afterwards.
Chris